GOP push to ban state AI laws ignites debate: What to know
...
The proposal, tucked into President Trump’s "one big, beautiful bill," calls for a 10-year moratorium on state laws regulating AI models, systems or automated decision systems. This includes enforcement of existing and future laws on the state level.
Proponents of the moratorium argue a patchwork of state laws can be confusing or burdensome for technology companies to follow when operating in multiple parts of the country. ...
The bill includes some exemptions for states’ enforcement of laws focused on promoting AI development.
This includes regulations that seek to remove barriers or facilitate the use of AI models and systems or those focused on streamlining processes like licensing or permitting to help AI adoption. ...
Meanwhile, many Democrats are against the moratorium over concerns it is overreaching and risks harm to consumers in the absence of a federal standard.
Democratic Rep. Doris Matsui (Calif.) called the moratorium a “slap in the face to American consumers.” ...
Lawmakers are concerned the provision may not pass the Byrd Rule, a procedural rule in the Senate prohibiting "extraneous matters" from being included in reconciliation packages. This includes provisions that do not “change outlays or revenues.” ...
See the full story here: https://thehill.com/policy/technology/5314757-house-republicans-propose-ai-regulation-ban/
Pages
- About Philip Lelyveld
- Mark and Addie Lelyveld Biographies
- Presentations and articles
- Trustworthy AI – A Market-Driven approach
- Tufts Alumni Bio